🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," said a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in safety.

While this international debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.